Storey v. Dunn
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 10/24/2016. (JLC)
2016 Oct-24 PM 02:32
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
JEFFERSON S. DUNN, Commissioner of )
the Alabama Department of Corrections,
This is a habeas corpus case filed, through counsel, by Brian Storey, an
Alabama state prisoner. (Doc. 1). In August 1999, Storey was convicted in the
Circuit Court of Madison County, Alabama, for a capital murder he committed
when he was 17 years old. The trial court imposed the then-mandatory minimum
sentence under state law: life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.
Relying upon the Supreme Court’s decisions in Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551
(2005); Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012); and Montgomery v. Louisiana,
136 S. Ct. 718 (2016), Storey filed this habeas action seeking relief in the form of
a new sentencing hearing at which the state court might consider whether a
sentence of life imprisonment with the possibility of parole is more appropriate.
Storey has now filed a motion to dismiss this action as moot. (Doc. 6). The court
concludes that the motion is due to be granted.
Storey states in his motion that, on September 15, 2016, the state trial court
issued an order granting relief from Storney’s mandatory life-without-parole
sentence and set the case for further resentencing. (Doc. 6 at 2). Because such
was the relief that Storey sought in his habeas petition, he states that the case is
moot. (Id.) The court agrees. “[A] case must be dismissed as moot if the court
can no longer provide ‘meaningful relief.’” Nyaga v. Ashcroft, 323 F.3d 906, 913
(11th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, this matter is due to be dismissed as moot. A
separate final order will be entered.
DONE, this 24th day of October, 2016.
VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?