Johnson v. Marshall

Filing 6

MEMORANDUM OPINIO - Having reviewed and considered the materials in the record, the Court adopts the magistrate judges report and accepts her recommendation. Accordingly, the Court will transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 10/11/2019. (KEK)

Download PDF
FILED 2019 Oct-11 AM 09:48 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION DAVID LAMAR JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. STEVE MARSHALL, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 5:19-cv-0836-MHH-SGC MEMORANDUM OPINION The petitioner, David Lamar Johnson, filed an amended habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his August 30, 2007 conviction in the Circuit Court of Houston County, Alabama. (Doc. 4). On July 19, 2019, the magistrate judge entered a report in which she recommended that the Court transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. (Doc. 5). The magistrate judge advised Mr. Johnson of his right to file specific written objections within 14 days; the Court has not received objections. A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). A district court reviews legal conclusions in a report de novo and reviews for plain error factual findings to which no objection is made. Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n. 9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749 (11th Cir. 1988); Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 Fed. Appx. 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Having reviewed and considered the materials in the record, the Court adopts the magistrate judge’s report and accepts her recommendation. Accordingly, the Court will transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). DONE this 10th day of October, 2019. _________________________________ MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?