Hammonds v. Callaway et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 7/15/2021. (MEB2)
2021 Jul-15 PM 02:52
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
RHONDA CALLAWAY, Warden, et
Case No. 5:21-cv-00064-LSC-SGC
Pro se petitioner Carlos Hammonds filed this action for a writ of habeas
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his conviction and 20 year
sentence for first degree robbery. (Doc. 1). On June 17, 2021, the magistrate judge
entered a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b),
recommending that habeas relief be denied and the petition dismissed with prejudice.
(Doc. 12). Although the magistrate judge advised Hammonds of his right to file
objections within 14 days, that time has expired with no objections having been filed.
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the
court file, including the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, the court
is of the opinion that the magistrate judge’s findings are due to be and are hereby
ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, the petition for
writ of habeas corpus is due to be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further,
because the petition does not present issues that are debatable among jurists of
reason, a certificate of appealability is also due to be DENIED. See 28 U.S.C. §
2253(c); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000); Rule 11(a), Rules
Governing § 2254 Proceedings. A separate Final Order will be entered.
DONE and ORDERED on July 15, 2021.
L. Scott Coogler
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?