Frazer v. Johnson Controls Inc et al

Filing 72

ORDER adopting and accepting #56 Report and Recommendations. denying #42 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn on 9/29/2013. (KAM, )

Download PDF
FILED 2013 Sep-30 AM 08:45 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION COURTNEY FRAZER, Plaintiff, vs. JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.; ANM SERVICES, LLC; EDIASA; GENOT’S AZ QUALITY SERVICES, INC., d/b/a/ AZ Quality; WILLIAM YEE, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 7:11-CV-3956-JHE ORDER On December 20, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation, (doc. 56),1 recommending that the Motion to Dismiss filed by ANM Services, (doc. 42), be denied based on his determination “that service on Varner [defendant ANM’s registered agent for service in Mississippi] constituted service on this defendant under Rule 4(h),” (doc. 56 at 3). ANM did not object to the Report and Recommendation and has filed an Answer. ANM’s Motion to Dismiss, (doc. 42), was referred to this court for disposition. Based on the court’s review of the record, the Report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and his Recommendation to deny ANM’s Motion to Dismiss is ACCEPTED. ANM’s Motion to Dismiss, (doc. 42), is DENIED. 1 Reference to a document number, [“Doc. ___”], refers to the number assigned to each document as it is filed in the court’s record. DONE, this 29th day of September, 2013. SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?