Alexander v. Allstate Indemnity Company et al

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; Accordingly, the claims against defendants George Terry and Stacy Terry hereby are SEVERED and REMANDED to the Circuit Court for Walker County, Alabama. The claim against defendan t Sharol St. Cin is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This Court retains jurisdiction over the claims against defendant Allstate Indemnity Company. The case is again referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 2/1/2013. (JLC)

Download PDF
FILED 2013 Feb-01 AM 10:28 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION SANDRA KAYE (BELL) ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, vs. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, SHAROL ST. CIN, GEORGE TERRY, and STACY TERRY, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 7:12-cv-3688-TMP ORDER The court has for consideration the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge T. Michael Putnam, filed on January 2, 2013, wherein he recommends that the claims against defendants George Terry and Stacy Terry be severed and remanded and the claim against defendant Sharol St. Cin be dismissed. No objections have been filed. Having considered the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the court hereby ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the claims against defendants George Terry and Stacy Terry hereby are SEVERED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to REMAND those claims to the Circuit Court for Walker County, Alabama, from whence this case was removed. The claim against defendant Sharol St. Cin is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This court retains jurisdiction over the claims against defendant Allstate Indemnity Company. The case is again referred to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. DONE and ORDERED this the 1st day of February, 2013. VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?