Shaw v. Hood et al

Filing 62

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 1/23/2017. (AVC)

Download PDF
FILED 2017 Jan-23 AM 10:18 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION NATHANIEL SHAW, Plaintiff, v. HUGH M. HOOD, et al., Defendants. } } } } } } } } } Case No.: 7:14-cv-389-RDP-JEO MEMORANDUM OPINION On January 4, 2017, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation was entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. On January 20, 2017, Petitioner filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 61). After careful consideration of the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and Petitioner’s objections thereto, the court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the Magistrate Judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge that the motions for summary judgment be granted and this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A separate order in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion will be entered. DONE and ORDERED this January 23, 2017. _________________________________ R. DAVID PROCTOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?