Pasture v. Tuscaloosa County Jail et al
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The court ADOPTS the legal standard for summary judgment as set out by the magistrate judge in his report. Applying that legal standard and taking the facts in the light most favorable to Mr. Pasture, the court disagrees with the magistrate judge's conclusion that no genuine issues of material fact exist in this case. Because the court finds that genuine issues of material fact exist regarding whether Officer O'Bryant purposefully and knowingly injured Mr. Pasture with a razor blade, the court DENIES Officer O'Bryant's motion for summary judgment. The court will set this case for pre-trial and trial by a separate order. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 9/19/17. (SAC )
FILED
2017 Sep-19 PM 04:14
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
WESTERN DIVISION
KENNEDY PASTURE,
Plaintiff
v.
OFFICER JOSEPH O’BRYANT,
Defendant
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 7:15-cv-00422-KOB-HNJ
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
The magistrate judge filed a report on March 3, 2017 (doc. 30),
recommending that the court grant the Defendant Officer O’Bryant’s motion for
summary judgment (doc. 20). No party has filed any objections.
The court has carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in
the court file, including the report and recommendation (doc. 30); Mr. Pasture’s
Amended Complaint (doc. 9); Officer O’Bryant’s Special Report and affidavit
(docs. 17 & 18); and Mr. Pasture’s Reply to the Special Report and affidavit (doc.
25). The court does not agree with all of the magistrate judge’s findings of fact or
his recommendation to grant summary judgment. For the following reasons, the
Page 1 of 6
court finds that genuine issues of material fact exist regarding whether Officer
O’Bryant purposefully and knowingly injured Mr. Pasture with a razor blade.
The court ADOPTS the legal standard for summary judgment as set out by
the magistrate judge in his report. Applying that legal standard and taking the
facts in the light most favorable to Mr. Pasture, the court disagrees with the
magistrate judge’s conclusion that no genuine issues of material fact exist in this
case. The magistrate judge’s statement of the facts seems to accept Officer
O’Bryant’s versions of events and ignores facts stated by Mr. Pasture regarding
comments made by Officer O’Bryant. After careful consideration of the entire
record, the court makes the following factual findings in the light most favorable
to Mr. Pasture. In doing so, the court notes that even unsubstantiated, self-serving
statements create genuine issues of material fact and defeat summary judgment.
See Feliciano v. City of Miami Beach, 707 F.3d 1244, 1253 (11th Cir. 2013).
When Officer O’Bryant went to search Mr. Pasture’s cell A-56 for
unaccounted for razor blades, Officer O’Bryant handcuffed Mr. Pasture and asked
Officer Wheelus to walk Mr. Pasture to the end of the catwalk near the shower
area. When they arrived at the end of the catwalk, Mr. Pasture asked Officer
Page 2 of 6
Wheelus if he could sit down on the ledge of the shower because the floor
surrounding the shower was wet. Officer Wheelus allowed Mr. Pasture to do so.1
After securing the other inmates in the cell, Officer O’Bryant then walked
over to Mr. Pasture and told him to sit on the floor. When Mr. Pasture explained
to Officer O’Bryant that Officer Wheelus told him he could sit on the ledge of the
shower, Officer O’Bryant became agitated with Mr. Pasture and told him “I’m
gonna teach you a lesson.”2 Officer O’Bryant used his left hand and grabbed Mr.
Pasture’s left arm, then used his right knee to “bump” Mr. Pasture’s left knee to
force him to the ground. Officer O’Bryant had a razor blade in his left hand when
he grabbed Mr. Pasture’s left arm and inflicted a 1-inch deep cut on his arm. Mr.
1
The magistrate judge seems to ignore Mr. Pasture’s statements regarding Officer Wheelus
giving him permission to sit on the shower ledge. Instead, the magistrate judge concluded that Mr.
Pasture did not comply with Officer O’Bryant’s orders to take knee. Interestingly, the record
contains no affidavit from Officer Wheelus indicating whether he gave Mr. Pasture permission to
sit on the shower ledge or supporting Officer O’Bryant’s version of the facts.
2
As the magistrate noted in a footnote in the report and recommendation, Mr. Pasture
initially indicated in the Amended Complaint and objections to the initial report and
recommendation that Officer O’Bryant cut him twice and made this statement before the second cut.
(Docs. 9 & 13). The magistrate judge stated that in the response to the summary judgment (doc. 25),
Mr. Pasture seemed to abandon the allegation that Officer O’Bryant cut him twice. (Doc. 30 at 6
n.3). However, whether Officer O’Bryant cut Mr. Pasture once or twice, Mr. Pasture has
consistently alleged that prior to cutting him, Officer O’Bryant stated he would “show him” or teach
Mr. Pasture a lesson and stated after the cutting that “it will be worse next time.” Although Mr.
Pasture’s allegations regarding how many times Officer O’Bryant cut him may affect his credibility
at trial, the court cannot ignore Mr. Pasture’s allegations that, prior to cutting him, Officer O’Bryant
made a statement indicating that he would “show” Mr. Pasture or teach him a lesson.
Page 3 of 6
Pasture yelled in pain and snatched his arm away from Officer O’Bryant, who
laughed and said “Believe me, it will be worse the next time.”
Mr. Pasture asked to see a doctor and the Sheriff, and Officer O’Bryant
yelled at him to “Shut up!” Officer O’Bryant then called for assistance and
administered first aid to Mr. Pasture by applying gauze and pressure to the cut.
Mr. Pasture was transported to the hospital where he received nine stitches.
From these facts taken in the light most favorable to Mr. Pasture, the court
finds that a jury could infer that Officer O’Bryant purposefully and knowingly
injured Mr. Pasture with a razor blade. Officer O’Bryant does not deny he had a
razor blade in his left hand when he grabbed Mr. Pasture’s left arm. He simply
states that “I did not realize that I had one of the razor blades in my hand when I
placed my hand on his arm.” (Doc. 18 at 10). The court is perplexed how Officer
O’Bryant could have a razor blade in his hand and not know it; how the razor
blade could stay in Officer O’Bryant’s hand as he opened it up to grab Mr.
Pasture’s left arm, without the blade falling to the ground or cutting Officer
O’Bryant’s hand in some way; and how the razor blade could “accidentally” make
a one-inch cut on Mr. Pasture’s arm without Officer O’Bryant’s knowledge or
intent. Likewise, a jury could be equally as “perplexed” and infer from the facts in
the light most favorable to Mr. Pasture that Officer O’Bryant was upset with Mr.
Page 4 of 6
Pasture for not sitting on the floor as instructed and cut him with the razor blade to
teach him a lesson.
The magistrate judge noted that, “in the face of Officer O’Bryant’s
unequivocal testimony,” Mr. Pasture failed to offer “significantly probative facts”
to show his injury was intentional. (Doc. 30 at 9). The court disagrees. The
perplexing presence of a razor blade in Officer O’Bryant’s hand that somehow
managed to inflict a one-inch cut in Mr. Pasture’s arm raises significant questions
of intent, and the fact that Officer O’Bryant denied that he made any statement
regarding teaching Mr. Pasture a lesson or that the injury would be worse next
time does not end the inquiry for summary judgment purposes. Mr. Pasture’s
sworn statement that Officer O’Bryant made those statements creates a genuine
issue of material fact from which a jury could infer purpose or intent.
At this stage in the proceedings, the court’s job is not to decide who is
telling the truth—that role belongs to a jury. The court’s role is to decide, based
on the facts in the light most favorable to Mr. Pasture, whether genuine issues of
material fact exist. If so, the court should let the jury make the necessary
credibility determinations. Because the court finds that genuine issues of material
fact exist regarding whether Officer O’Bryant purposefully and knowingly injured
Page 5 of 6
Mr. Pasture with a razor blade, the court DENIES Officer O’Bryant’s motion for
summary judgment (doc. 20).
The court will set this case for pre-trial and trial by a separate order.
DONE and ORDERED this 19th day of September, 2017.
____________________________________
KARON OWEN BOWDRE
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 6 of 6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?