Michel v. Federal Bureau of Prison FCI et al

Filing 14

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 3/28/2017. (KAM)

Download PDF
FILED 2017 Mar-28 AM 10:34 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION HELENE MICHEL, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS FCI, et al., } } } } } } } } } Case No.: 7:16-cv-00863-RDP-HGD Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION On February 21, 2017, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation was entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. On March 9, 2017, Petitioner filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. After careful consideration of the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and Petitioner’s objections thereto, the court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the Magistrate Judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that Plaintiff’s claims against Federal Bureau of Prisons, MDC Brooklyn; Duke Terrell, Warden; Rolando Newland, M.; Rios Sixto, MLP; and Rosa Soroya, MLP, be severed from this action and transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York for all further proceedings. The court ACCEPTS the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Federal Bureau of Prisons; A. Washington-Adduci, Warden; Ella Taylor, Health Services Administrator; L. McCullar, M.D.; and R. Griffin, M.D., Clinical Director, remain pending in this action. A separate order in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion will be entered. DONE and ORDERED this March 28, 2017. _________________________________ R. DAVID PROCTOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?