Smith v. Bennett et al

Filing 39

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 5/8/2018. (KAM)

Download PDF
FILED 2018 May-08 PM 12:36 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION SERON SMITH, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM BENNETT, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 7:16-cv-01421-RDP-TMP MEMORANDUM OPINION The Magistrate Judge filed a report on April 13, 2018, recommending that all federal claims in this action be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). (Doc. 38). The Magistrate Judge further recommended that all state law negligence claims be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c). (Id.). Although the Magistrate Judge advised Plaintiff of his right to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days, no objections have been received by the court. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the Magistrate Judge’s report is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), all federal claims in this action are due to be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Additionally, Plaintiff’s state law negligence claims are due to be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). A Final Judgment will be entered. DONE and ORDERED this May 8, 2018. _________________________________ R. DAVID PROCTOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?