Durden v. Warden, FCI Aliceville Alabama
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM OPINION: The Court ADOPTS the report and ACCEPTS the recommendation. The Court will deny the petitioner's claims as unexhausted and dismiss them without prejudice. The Court will enter a separate final judgment that carries out this ruling and closes this case. Signed by Judge Corey L Maze on 8/28/2024. (LCB)
FILED
2024 Aug-29 PM 04:21
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
WESTERN DIVISION
AUTUMN LIANN DURDEN,
Petitioner,
v.
Case No. 7:23-cv-620-CLM-SGC
WARDEN, FCI ALICEVILLE,
Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The magistrate judge has entered a report (doc. 15), recommending the
court deny as unexhausted the petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus
under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The report advised the parties of the right to object
within 14 days, but that deadline has expired and the court has not received
any objections.
After considering the record and the magistrate judge’s report, the
court ADOPTS the report and ACCEPTS the recommendation. So the court
will deny the petitioner’s claims as unexhausted and dismiss them without
prejudice.
The court will enter a separate final judgment that carries out this
ruling and closes this case.
The court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to provide a copy of this
memorandum opinion and the accompanying final judgment to the petitioner
at her address of record and the address identified in the report and
recommendation (doc. 15, p. 6).
Done on August 29, 2024.
_________________________________
COREY L. MAZE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?