Peacock v. Merrill

Filing 700

Order entered that on March 1, 2010, Plaintiff Linda Peacock and Defendants Floragon Forest Products Molalla, Inc., FFP, Inc., FFPM, Inc., Floragon Forest Products, Inc., Floragon Holding Company, Inc., Floragon Manufacturing Company, Inc., and Flora gon Timber, LLC (collectively, the Floragon Defendants) filed a joint stipulation of dismissal (doc. 688) agreeing to the dismissal of all remaining claims against the Floragon Defendants prejudice, costs taxed as paid. Pursuant to that stipulation, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiffs claims against the Floragon Defendants be and hereby are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 3/10/2010. (mca)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION LINDA PEACOCK, Plaintiff, v. BURNEY H. MERRILL, et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-0377-KD-C ORDER On March 1, 2010, Plaintiff Linda Peacock and Defendants Floragon Forest Products Molalla, Inc., FFP, Inc., FFPM, Inc., Floragon Forest Products, Inc., Floragon Holding Company, Inc., Floragon Manufacturing Company, Inc., and Floragon Timber, LLC (collectively, "the Floragon Defendants") filed a joint stipulation of dismissal (doc. 688) agreeing "to the dismissal of all remaining claims against the Floragon Defendants prejudice, costs taxed as paid." Pursuant to that stipulation,1 it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiff's claims against the Floragon Defendants be and hereby are DISMISSED with prejudice. DONE this 10th day of March, 2010. /s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Because this stipulation of dismissal is not signed by all parties who have appeared in this action, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii), it must be treated as a motion to dismiss. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) (dismissal by court order necessary if requirements of voluntary dismissal are not met). 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?