Muhammad v. Dale

Filing 100

ORDER ADOPTING the 96 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is ORDERED thatPlaintiff's documents entitled Clarification (Doc. 66), Default Judgment, Freed, Monetary Relief, Requested (Doc. 74), Motion to Leave of Court Amend Relief in Plaintiff Favor (Doc. 75), Motion to Leave of Court Plaintiff Amend Motion for Objection, and Default Pursuant FRCP 55" (Doc. 76) be and are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge William H. Steele on 9/15/08. Copy mailed to plaintiff (tgw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION DRELIJAH MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, vs. LEROY DALE, Defendant. : : : : : ORDER After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection (Docs. 98 and 99) is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's documents entitled "Clarification" (Doc. 66), "Default Judgment, Freed, Monetary Relief, Requested" (Doc. 74), "Motion to Leave of Court Amend Relief in Plaintiff Favor" (Doc. 75), "Motion to Leave of Court Plaintiff Amend Motion for Objection, and Default Pursuant FRCP 55" (Doc. 76) be and are hereby DENIED. DONE and ORDERED this 15th day of September, 2008. CIVIL ACTION 06-00315-WS-B s/WILLIAM H. STEELE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?