Baldwin v. City Of Prichard

Filing 47

JUDGMENT entered in accordance with the memorandum opinion and order entered this date. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 5/4/09. (eec)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION YVONNE M. BALDWIN, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF PRICHARD, ALABAMA, Defendant. JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion and order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the motion for a new trial (Doc. 29) and motion to alter or amend judgment (Doc. 30) filed by the defendant are due to be and the same hereby are DENIED. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiff's motion for prospective equitable relief (Doc. 28) be and the same hereby is GRANTED. In addition to the $135,642.07 in backpay and $99,869.93 in compensatory damages previously awarded plaintiff by the jury and confirmed by the undersigned (see Doc. 27, Judgment ("In accordance with the verdict of the jury entered on December 18, 2008, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the plaintiff shall have and take from the defendant, City : : : CA 07-0789-C : : of Prichard, the sum of $235,512.00.")), plaintiff is AWARDED front pay in the amount of $83,172.54 and prejudgment interest of $13,361.56 on the backpay award. Post-judgment interest will accrue on the entire damage award, $332,046.10, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1961(a). DONE and ORDERED this the 4th day of May, 2009. s/WILLIAM E. CASSADY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?