Adams et al v. Austal, U.S.A., L.L.C.

Filing 359

Order re: April 14, 2011 evidentiary hearing on the Defendants Motion to Exclude the reports and purported testimony of Edwin L. Bradley, Ph.D. (Doc. 345) and Plaintiffs Response (Doc. 354). Pursuant to Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm. Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), the parties are instructed to be prepared to present to the Court, at this April 14, 2011 evidentiary hearing, any witnesses and evidence they deem necessary regarding the motion. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 4/7/2011. (cmj)

Download PDF
Adams et al v. Austal, U.S.A., L.L.C. Doc. 359 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION EARATON ADAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. AUSTAL, USA, L.LC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO 08-0155-KD-N ORDER This matter is before the Court concerning the April 14, 2011 evidentiary hearing on the Defendant's Motion to Exclude the reports and purported testimony of Edwin L. Bradley, Ph.D. (Doc. 345) and Plaintiffs' Response (Doc. 354). Pursuant to Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm. Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), the parties are instructed to be prepared to present to the Court, at this April 14, 2011 evidentiary hearing, any witnesses and evidence they deem necessary regarding the motion. DONE and ORDERED this the 7th day of April 2011. /s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.co

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?