Adams et al v. Austal, U.S.A., L.L.C.

Filing 469

Order striking 445 Objection and 453 Notice (attachment 2). The parties shall, by 9/21/2011 at 12:00 p.m. (noon), file new Objections to the Trial Exhibits in the manner referenced supra. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 9/16/2011. copies to parties. (sdb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION EARATON ADAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. AUSTAL, USA, L.LC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO 08-0155-KD-N ORDER This matter is before the Court on a review of the parties’ Objections to Trial Exhibits. (Docs. 445 and 453-2). The parties’ objections, as presently framed, are rote boilerplate statements, repetitive “cut and paste,” multiple choice, or otherwise generally unhelpful to the Court. As such, the parties shall file new Objections which are substantive in nature and which are actually tailored to each exhibit (i.e., which will provide the Court with a preview of the real issue for each exhibit rather than repetitive (and conclusory) reference to the Federal Rules). See, e.g., Doc. 306, Civil Action 10-00072-KD-N, Crouch, et al., v. Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc. (S.D. Ala. June 24, 2011). These new Objections shall consist of a short one (1) paragraph explanation for each objection. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Docs. 445 and 453-2 are hereby STRICKEN. It is further ORDERED that the parties shall, on or before Wednesday, September 21, 2011 at 12:00 p.m. (noon), file new Objections to the Trial Exhibits in the manner referenced supra. DONE and ORDERED this the 16th day of September 2011. /s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?