Adams et al v. Austal, U.S.A., L.L.C.
Order striking 445 Objection and 453 Notice (attachment 2). The parties shall, by 9/21/2011 at 12:00 p.m. (noon), file new Objections to the Trial Exhibits in the manner referenced supra. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 9/16/2011. copies to parties. (sdb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EARATON ADAMS, et al.,
AUSTAL, USA, L.LC.,
CIVIL ACTION NO 08-0155-KD-N
This matter is before the Court on a review of the parties’ Objections to Trial Exhibits.
(Docs. 445 and 453-2). The parties’ objections, as presently framed, are rote boilerplate statements,
repetitive “cut and paste,” multiple choice, or otherwise generally unhelpful to the Court. As such,
the parties shall file new Objections which are substantive in nature and which are actually tailored
to each exhibit (i.e., which will provide the Court with a preview of the real issue for each exhibit
rather than repetitive (and conclusory) reference to the Federal Rules). See, e.g., Doc. 306, Civil
Action 10-00072-KD-N, Crouch, et al., v. Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc. (S.D. Ala. June 24,
2011). These new Objections shall consist of a short one (1) paragraph explanation for each
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Docs. 445 and 453-2 are hereby STRICKEN. It is
further ORDERED that the parties shall, on or before Wednesday, September 21, 2011 at 12:00
p.m. (noon), file new Objections to the Trial Exhibits in the manner referenced supra.
DONE and ORDERED this the 16th day of September 2011.
/s/ Kristi K. DuBose
KRISTI K. DuBOSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?