Cotrell et al v. Lovette et al
Order re: evidentiary hrg held on 6/17/10, judgment will be entered against Lee Henry McGrew in favor of Choctaw County Commission in the amount of $20,902.77 plus attnys fees & costs. Counter-Plf is to file an accounting & supporting documents on or before 7/7/2010 re: its claimed attnys fees & costs solely as they relate to the counterclaim against McGrew. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 6/21/10. (copies mailed to Plfs/Counter Dfts Cottrell, Fitch & McGrew on 6/21/10) (tot) Modified on 6/21/2010 (tot).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION LEE HENRY McGREW, Plaintiff/ Counter Defendant, vs. CHOCTAW COUNTY COMMISSION, Defendant/Counter Plaintiff. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-0646-CG-M
ORDER This matter is before the court for default judgment as to counter-plaintiff's claims against counter-defendant, Lee Henry McGrew. Summary judgment was previously granted in favor of defendant regarding all of plaintiffs' claims (Doc. 76), and defendant reports that it has settled its counterclaims against counter defendants, Maurice Fitch and Robert Cotrell (Doc. 87). The only remaining claim is defendant's counterclaims against Mr. McGrew. Default was previously entered by the clerk as to the counterclaims against Mr. McGrew. (Doc. 89). On June, 17, 2010, an evidentiary hearing was held and testimony was offered to support counter-plaintiff's claim for damages against Mr. McGrew. Mr. McGrew, pro se, participated in the hearing. He crossexamined some of counter-plaintiff's witnesses and testified himself when called by counterplaintiff. After review of the record and the testimony and evidence offered at the hearing, the court finds that counter-plaintiff is entitled to judgment in the amount of $20,902.77. The effect of a default is that the defendant admits the plaintiff's well-pleaded allegations of fact. See Buchanan v. Bowman, 820 F.2d 359, 361 (11th Cir. 1987). Although a defaulted defendant admits well-pleaded allegations of liability, allegations relating to the amount of 1
damages are not admitted by virtue of default. Rather, the court determines the amount and character of damages to be awarded. See 10A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT, ARTHUR R. MILLER & MARY KAY KANE, FEDERAL PRACTICE & PROCEDURE ' 2688 (3d ed. 1998). The counterclaim asserts claims for falsifying records, several different kinds of fraud, deceit, negligence, civil conspiracy, and unjust enrichment. (Doc. 31). The basis for counterplaintiff's claims is that, while employed by Choctaw County, Alabama, Mr. McGrew reported more time on his timesheets than he actually worked, and was therefore overpaid. (Doc. 31, p. 3). Counter-plaintiff presented evidence showing the difference between the time recorded on McGrew's time sheets and the time he actually worked during the 3-year period from April 2004 to April 2007. The evidence presented showed that the time recording differences resulted in McGrew being overpaid by $20,902.77 during that time period. Counter-plaintiff also presented evidence that, if the average pay period difference was extrapolated out over 6 years of McGrew's employment, the resulting overpayment would be $43,867.09. However, counter-plaintiff did not obtain or use the time sheet and radio logs for those portions of the 6-year period other than from April 2004 to April 2007 to determine the actual overpayment. As such, the court finds that counter-plaintiff has not proved what the difference was between the time recorded on McGrew's time sheets and the time he actually worked during the additional 3 years. An extrapolation from the average overpayment in the April 2004 to April 2007 time period is not a sufficient basis of proof for the additional time period. The court finds that the record and evidence provided supports a finding that McGrew was overpaid in the amount of $20,902.77, The court, therefore, finds that counter plaintiff should be awarded damages in that amount.
CONCLUSION For the reasons stated above, judgment will be entered against Lee Henry McGrew and in favor of Choctaw County Commission in the amount of $20,902.77 plus attorneys fees and costs. Counter-plaintiff is ORDERED to file, on or before July 7, 2010, an accounting and supporting documents regarding its claimed attorneys fees and costs solely as they relate to the counterclaim against Lee Henry McGrew. DONE and ORDERED this 21st day of June, 2010.
/s/ Callie V. S. Granade CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?