Hunter v. City of Mobile
Order re: 97 Trial Brief filed by City of Mobile and 100 Reply Brief filed by William C. Hunter. The defendant asks the court to strike the plaintiff's claims for liquidated damages under the ADEA and Alabama ADEA; the City's request is DENIED. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 4/13/10. (srr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM C. HUNTER Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MOBILE Defendant . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-00666-KD-M
ORDER Before the Court is Defendant City of Mobile's trial brief regarding damages (Doc. 97), and the plaintiff's response (Doc. 100). The defendant asks the Court to strike the plaintiff's claims for liquidated damages under the ADEA and Alabama ADEA. The Court adopts the reasoning set out by the Third Circuit in Potence v. Hazelton Area School Dist., 357 F. 3d 366 (3d Cir. 2004): The ADEA incorporates the enforcement powers, remedies, and procedures of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") set forth in 29 U.S.C. §§ 211(b), 216 (except for subsection (a)), and 217. 29 U.S.C. § 626(b). The enforcement provision of the [ADEA] expressly provides for imposition of liquidated damages payable "in cases of willful violations of this chapter." 29 U.S.C. § 626(b). The FLSA further provides that "[a]ny employer who violates [the FLSA] shall be liable to the employee or employees affected in the amount of their unpaid minimum wages, or their unpaid overtime compensation, as the case may be, and in an additional amount as liquidated damages. 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). Thus, when a jury finds that an employer willfully violated the ADEA, the basic damages award may be doubled under this liquidated damages provision. .... The ADEA makes it unlawful for an employer "to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge" an individual because of his or her age. 29 U.S.C. § 623(a)(1). Included in the ADEA's definition of employer
is "a State or political subdivision of a State and any agency or instrumentality of a State or a political subdivision of a State." 29 U.S.C. § 630(b). The ADEA could not be more explicit in imposing liability for age discrimination against municipalities. Similarly explicit is the ADEA's contemplation of the imposition of liquidated damages, as it states in pertinent part "[t]hat liquidated damages shall be payable only in cases of willful violations of this chapter." 29 U.S.C. § 626(b). The FLSA provisions incorporated in the ADEA provide for the imposition of liquidated damages "against any employer (including a public agency)," 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), and the statutory definition of a "public agency" includes "State[s] or political subdivisions thereof," 29 U.S.C. § 203(x). Id. at 372-73. Accordingly, "[i]nasmuch as the statute expressly authorizes that imposition of liquidated damages against a municipality, even though such damages are punitive in nature," the City's request to strike Hunter's claim for liquidated damages under the ADEA is DENIED. See also Freeman v. City of Mobile, 146 F.3d 1292, 1305 (11th Cir. 1998) (Kravitch, J., concurring and noting that "a public agency found to have violated FLSA's overtime requirements is liable to its employees in the amount of . . . unpaid overtime compensation . . . and in an additional equal amount as liquidated damages . . . ." Id. (internal quotation omitted)). DONE and ORDERED this the 13th day of April, 2010. /s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DUBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?