Lemley et al v. Midwest Automation, Inc. et al

Filing 129

ORDER granting in part 116 Motion to Stay. A new deadline for the parties' Rule 26(f) meeting and report scheduling order will be established, if necessary, after the Court has ruled on the pending motion to remand.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 2/13/09. (cmj)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES LEMLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. MIDWEST AUTOMATION, INC., et al., Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay (Doc. 116). In their motion, Plaintiffs request that the deadline

CIVIL ACTION 08-00738-KD-B

for the parties' Rule 26(f) meeting and report be extended until after a ruling on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Doc. 32). After a

careful review of the instant motion, and the case file, the undersigned is satisfied that it is in the best interest of all parties to delay the parties' Rule 26(f) meeting and report until after a ruling on the Motion to Remand. Accordingly, for good cause shown, Plaintiffs' motion is GRANTED, in part. A new deadline for

the parties' Rule 26(f) meeting and report scheduling order will be established, to the extent necessary, after the Court has ruled on the pending Motion to Remand. DONE this 13th day of February, 2009. /s/ Sonja F. Bivins UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE