United States of America v. Good

Filing 11

ORDER granting 10 Motion to Amend. The only change to the previous order is the location of the interview. Shane Good is to appear at the Daphne Municipal Courthouse 2/27/09 at 11:00 as set out. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 2/19/09. (copy mailed) (cmj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. SHANE GOOD, Respondent. * * * * * * * * * ORDER This matter is before the court on respondent, Shane Good's, "Motion to Request Interview to Take Place in Daphne Municipal Courthouse" (doc. 10) filed February 18, 2009. Mr. Good moves the court to "allow [him] to fulfill [his] obligation of the enforced summons at the Daphne Municipal Courthouse on the assigned date" on the grounds, in sum, that it would be a hardship to drive to West Mobile for the interview. Upon consideration, the motion to change the location of the interview is GRANTED.1 Respondent, Shane Good, shall appear in person before IRS Revenue Officer Richard Wilder, or any other officer designated by the IRS, at the following location: Daphne Municipal Courthouse, 1502 U.S. Hwy.98, Daphne, AL 36532, (251) 621-2824 on Friday, February 27, 2009, at 11:00 a.m., 2 at which time Respondent shall comply fully with the Summons and produce books, papers, records, or other requested information, or give testimony in accordance Misc. No. 08-0022-KD-M The staff of the undersigned contacted the AUSA assigned to this action and he expressed that the government had no objection to the change in location. The only change is the location of the interview. The date and time, as set out in the court's original order (doc. 8), remain unchanged. 1 2 1 with the summons. DONE this the 19th day of February 2009. /s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?