Pugh v. Dix et al

Filing 9

Order for plaintiff to file new form 1983 complaint by 3/2/09. ( Miscellaneous deadline set for 3/2/2009.) Plaintiff's motions to amend complaint are denied as set out.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 2/2/09. (order and 1983 form mailed to plaintiff) (cmj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER LENARD PUGH, Plaintiff, vs. RICHARD DIX, et al., Defendants. : : : : : ORDER Plaintiff, an Alabama inmate proceeding pro se, filed a complaint alleging violations under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (Doc. 1), together with motion to proceed without prepayment of fees. (Doc. 2).1 Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 1) is not on the form required by Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to complete and CIVIL ACTION 09-00016-KD-B this Court. file, by March 2, 2009, this Court's current form for a complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983. See Local Rule 83.9(d)(1). Plaintiff's new complaint Plaintiff will shall supersede not rely his upon original his complaint; therefore, If original complaint. additional pages are needed, Plaintiff shall follow the format contained in the form complaint when completing the additional pages. Failure to comply with this Order within the prescribed time or to advise the Court of a change in address will result in the Plaintiff also filed four motions to amend the complaint (Docs. 3, 4, 7, 8) and a Request for Further Instructions (Doc. 5). In light of the instant Order directing Plaintiff to refile his complaint, Plaintiff's motions are denied as Plaintiff's new complaint will supersede his original complaint. 1 dismissal of this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to obey the Court's Order. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff the form for a complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983. DONE this 2nd day of February, 2009. /s/ Sonja F.Bivins UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?