McDonald v. Gray et al

Filing 14

Order entered that this action is before the Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).In order for plaintiffs amended complaint to be properly screened, additional information is needed. Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED by 12/7/09 to file a copy of the disciplinary report for the disciplinary about which he complains and the corresponding incident report. Information concerning the wardens reversal is ORDERED to be included in this information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 11/6/09. (mca)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION NATHANIEL MCDONALD, Plaintiff, vs. WAYNE GRAY, et al., Defendants. : : : : : ORDER This action is before the Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). In order for plaintiff's amended complaint to be properly screened, additional information is needed. Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED by December 7, 2009 to file a copy of the disciplinary report for the disciplinary about which he complains and the corresponding incident report. Information concerning the warden's reversal is ORDERED to be included in this information. The failure to comply with this order within the prescribed time will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute and to obey the Court's order. DONE this 6th day of November, 2009. /s/ Katherine P. Nelson KATHERINE P. NELSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CIVIL ACTION 09-0056-KD-N

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?