Wachovia Bank, National Association v. Horizon Wholesale Foods, LLC et al
Order re: 32 MOTION relief from Judgment filed by Jeffrey F. Parr, Leonard L. Gilbert, Horizon Wholesale Foods, LLC, Warren Day. Additional briefing due by 9/15/2011 from defendants; plaintiff to file any reply by 9/29/2011.. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 9/8/2011. (Order also mailed certified, return receipt, restricted delivery. Mark Upton added as to CM/ECF. (Jonathon Law 70092820000109632324) (Mark Upton 70092820000109632331) (cmj)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL
HORIZON WHOLESALE FOODS, LLC,
WARREN DAY, LEONARD L.
GILBERT, and JEFFREY F. PARR,
Civil Action No. 09-0072-KD-B
This action is before the Court on the motion for relief from judgment filed by defendants
Horizon Wholesale Foods, LLC, Warren Day, Leonard L. Gilbert, and Jeffrey F. Parr (doc. 32).
Defendants assert that their counsel of record “failed to receive any notices from the Court,
including but not limited to the Court’s Show Cause Order” and the “Plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Judgment.” (Id. p. 1). The motion is supported by the affidavits of defense counsel
Mark J. Upton and Jonathon R. Law wherein they state that after the parties’ planning meeting
neither the attorneys nor their staff received any notices, although they both state that they were
properly registered with the Court’s CM/ECF system.
A review of the docket indicates that although Upton participated in the parties’ planning
meeting and the filing of the Report of Parties’ Planning Meeting (doc. 13), Upton was not added
to the designation of counsel and consequently, neither he nor his staff were included in delivery
of service by way of the Court’s CM/ECF system. The Notice of Electronic Filing for the Report
(doc. 13) and the Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order (doc. 14, entered May 8, 2009), show that notice
was electronically mailed to Jonathon R. Law at email@example.com and to firstname.lastname@example.org, but
not to Upton or his staff.
A review of the Notices of Electronic Filing for documents filed after entry of the Rule
16(b) Scheduling Order, shows that approximately a dozen notices were sent electronically to
Jonathon R. Law at email@example.com and to firstname.lastname@example.org. In other words, between the two,
at least twenty-four notices were sent.
Nothing in the Court’s docket indicates that the electronic notices were not delivered or
undeliverable. At present, the Court has not sought any further investigation by the information
technology department or by the Clerk designated with oversight of the CM/ECF system.
Also, the Certificate of Judgment (doc. 30) and the Clerk’s Certification of a Judgment
to be Registered in Another District (doc. 31) were mailed to Jonathon R. Law, P. O. Box 1800,
Daphne, Al 36526-1800, in April of 2010. Nothing in the docket indicate that these letters were
returned as undeliverable.
Additionally, the Plaintiff’s Statement Regarding Settlement Potential (doc. 23) filed on
September 30, 2009, after the motion for summary judgment was filed and the order setting
deadlines had been entered, states as follows:
1. On September 1, 2009, Plaintiff’s counsel submitted a letter to Defendants’
counsel in an effort to arrange an in-person settlement conference in accordance
with the Scheduling Order. Plaintiff’s counsel never received a response to the
letter from Defendants’ counsel.
2. Since that time, Plaintiff’s counsel called and left a message with Defendants’
counsel. Plaintiff’s counsel did not receive a return call or any communication
whatsoever from Defendants’ counsel.
3. Accordingly, settlement negotiations are not taking place, and Plaintiff’s
counsel does not believe that this matter has settlement potential.
In consideration of the Statement, Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins entered an order
wherein defendants were ordered to show cause why they should not be held in contempt for
failure to comply with the Court’s Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order which required the parties to
confer and submit a joint Statement Regarding Settlement (doc. 24). This order was sent
electronically to Jonathon R. Law at email@example.com and to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Accordingly, upon consideration of the foregoing, defendants shall provide additional
briefing on or before September 15, 2011, to further explain why the motion for relief from
judgment should be granted. Upon receipt of the brief, Plaintiff shall file any reply on or before
September 29, 2011.
The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Jonathon R. Law and Mark J. Upton,
individually, by certified mail, return receipt requested, restricted delivery to the addressee, in
addition to service by the CM/ECF system.
In that regard, the Clerk is also directed to take the
steps necessary to properly add Mark J. Upton as counsel of record for defendants such that he
shall also receive electronic notification.
DONE and ORDERED this the 8th day of September, 2011.
s/ Kristi K. DuBose
KRISTI K. DuBOSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?