Harrison v. Culliver et al

Filing 83

ORDER ADOPTING 77 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is recommended that Defendants' 34 and 35 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted, that this action be dismissed with prejudice, and that judgment be entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff on all claims. It is further recommended that Plaintiff's pending motions (Docs. 36 , 37 , 70 , 75 ) be denied as MOOT. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 9/22/2011. (mbp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION JODY O’NEIL HARRISON, Plaintiff, v. GRANT CULLIVER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION 09-00283-KD-C ORDER After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and dated August 26, 2011, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docs. 34, 35) is GRANTED and the Plaintiff=s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.1 DONE and ORDERED this the 22nd day of September 2011. /s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 As such, Plaintiff’s motions (Docs. 36, 37, 70, 75) are DENIED as MOOT. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?