LaRose v. Noble Drilling Services, Inc.

Filing 31

ORDER entered that plaintiff's motion to withdraw 30 is GRANTED. Defendant's motion to strike 29 is MOOT. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 11/6/09. (mca)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMYE N. LaROSE, Plaintiff, vs. NOBLE DRILLING SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 09-00385-KD-B ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Amended Verified Complaint (Doc. 29) and Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw his Amended Complaint (Doc. 30). In Plaintiff's motion to withdraw, he admits that he unintentionally failed to comply with Rule 15(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because he did not seek leave of court before filing the amended verified complaint. (Doc. 30 at 2). For this reason, he seeks to withdraw the amended complaint. (Id.) Upon consideration, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw (Doc. 30) is GRANTED. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Strike (Doc. 29) is MOOT. DONE and ORDERED this the 6th day of November 2009. /s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DUBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?