Richardson v. Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Co.
ORDER ADOPTING 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS subject to the clarification contained in this order, re 9 MOTION to Alter Judgment MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Keith Richardson recommending that the motion to remand be granted and this action be remanded to the Circuit Court of Conecuh County, Alabama.. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 10/29/09. (cmj)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. )CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-0451)KD-N ) FORT DEARBORN LIFE INS.CO., et al.,) ) Defendants. ) ORDER After due and proper consideration of all pleadings in this file, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636 (Doc. 15) is adopted as the opinion of this Court, subject to the following clarification. This Court construes as typographical errors the Magistrate Judge's references on page 6 of the Report and Recommendation to claims of "nuisance, negligence, wantonness or trespass against the employee defendants" and to a cause of action against "any of the employee defendants." In interpreting and adopting the Report and Recommendation, this Court replaced the above quoted phrases with the respective phrases "breach of contract, bad faith refusal to pay a valid insurance claim, and outrage against Defendant Bass" and "against Defendant Bass." The Court understands the Magistrate Judge as having KEITH RICHARDSON,
intended to refer to Plaintiff Richardson's claims against Defendant Bass rather than to the claims actually listed, which were not alleged in this lawsuit. It is ORDERED that the petitioner's plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. 9) is GRANTED and the case REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Conecuh County, Alabama. DONE this 20th day of October, 2009. /s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DUBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?