Albert v. Taylor et al
ORDER ADOPTING 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is ORDERED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice, prior to service of process, because the claims are either frivolous or fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 12/7/10. copy mailed to plaintiff. (sdb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION PAUL JASON ALBERT, Plaintiff, vs. WILLIAM S. TAYLOR, et al., Defendants. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION 09-0465-CG-C
ORDER After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made1, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) because the claims are either frivolous or fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. DONE and ORDERED this 7th day of December, 2010. /s/ Callie V. S. Granade UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff filed a document which he labeled as an objection to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13), but that document did no more than state a general objection to the R&R, and further informed the court that he would henceforth be represented by counsel and was no longer indigent. No counsel has made an appearance in the case on his behalf and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee. Withdrawals continue to be made from his prison account to pay that fee.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?