Robinson v. Giles
ORDER ADOPTING 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY 22 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 6/22/10. (jal) (Clerk mailed copy to Appellant, e-mailed to USCA).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION CHARLES ROBINSON, Plaintiff, vs. J.C. GILES, Defendant. : : : : ORDER After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, this Court certifies that the issues Petitioner seeks to raise on appeal are Awithout arguable merit either in law or fact,@ Napier v. Preslicka, 314 F.3d 528, 531 (11th Cir. 2002); Bilal v. Driver, 251 F.3d 1346, 1349 (11th Cir. 2001), and are therefore not brought in good faith. In light of that certification, Petitioner=s Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 22) is hereby DENIED. DONE this 22nd day of June, 2010. ________ s/WILLIAM H. STEELE CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CIVIL ACTION 09-00488-WS-B :
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?