Braggs v. Keith Realty Midtown/Corporate Overseer et al

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING the 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is ORDEREDthat Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Keith Realty Midtown/Corporate Overseer, Robert Keith, Nofio Pecoraro, Susan Milling, and Dauphin Realty, Inc., be and are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice, prior to service of process, forfailure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 7/26/10. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)

Braggs v. Keith Realty Midtown/Corporate Overseer et al

Doc. 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ERNEST BRAGGS Plaintiff, vs. KEITH REALTY MIDTOWN/ CORPORATE OVERSEER, et al., Defendants. ORDER After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff=s claims against Defendants Keith Realty Midtown/Corporate Overseer, Robert Keith, Nofio Pecoraro, Susan Milling, and Dauphin Realty, Inc., be and are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. DONE this 26th day of July, 2010. s/WILLIAM H. STEELE CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE : : : : : CIVIL ACTION 10-00058-WS-C

Dockets.Justia.com