Braggs v. Keith Realty Midtown/Corporate Overseer et al

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING the 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is ORDEREDthat Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Keith Realty Midtown/Corporate Overseer, Robert Keith, Nofio Pecoraro, Susan Milling, and Dauphin Realty, Inc., be and are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice, prior to service of process, forfailure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 7/26/10. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)

Download PDF
Braggs v. Keith Realty Midtown/Corporate Overseer et al Doc. 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ERNEST BRAGGS Plaintiff, vs. KEITH REALTY MIDTOWN/ CORPORATE OVERSEER, et al., Defendants. ORDER After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff=s claims against Defendants Keith Realty Midtown/Corporate Overseer, Robert Keith, Nofio Pecoraro, Susan Milling, and Dauphin Realty, Inc., be and are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. DONE this 26th day of July, 2010. s/WILLIAM H. STEELE CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE : : : : : CIVIL ACTION 10-00058-WS-C Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?