Muhammad v. Option One Mortgage Corporation et al

Filing 102

ORDER DENYING Plf's 99 Motion for Default Judgment against Dft Humphrey, DENYING Plf's 100 Motion for Reconsideration of Dismissal of Humphries & Friedman, & DENYING Plf's 101 Motion for Relief from Judgment as set out. Plf's request for recusal of Judge Coogler is also DENIED. Signed by District Judge L. Scott Coogler on 8/9/10. (copy mailed to Plf on 8/10/10) (tot)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION BERNICE MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, vs. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORP., et al., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) 1:10-CV-00096-SC ) ) ) ) ) ORDER The Court has for consideration Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against defendant Scott J. Humphrey (Doc. 99), filed August 3, 2010; motion to reconsider the dismissal of Scott J. Humphrey and Barry Friedman (Doc. 100), filed August 3, 2010; and motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) (Doc. 101), filed August 6, 2010. Plaintiff's motions are DENIED. In response to Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint on March 19, 2010 (Doc. 17), the Court issued an Order generally summarizing rules of civil procedure and the factual requirements for a

Page 1 of 2

well-pled complaint (Doc. 22). Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint failed to state a claim against all named defendants, including Scott J. Humphrey and Barry Friedman. Plaintiff has not established any grounds for relief from this Court's order of dismissal under Federal Rule of Procedure 60(b). To the extent Plaintiff seeks recusal of the undersigned, that request is also DENIED. Done this 9th day of August 2010.

____________ L. SCOTT COOGLER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
139297

Page 2 of 2