Love v. City Of Mobile et al
FINAL JUDGMENT entered in favor of City Of Mobile, Kevin Rodgers, Officer Bryan Mims, Officer Carlos Walton, Officer Clay Godwin, Officer Harry Milbrath, Officer Joe Cotner against Antonio Love. Plaintiff's claims against said defendants DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Cost of aforementioned defendants are to be taxed against the plaintiff. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 8/29/2011. (mab)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
CITY OF MOBILE, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-0166-CG-C
In accordance with the court=s memorandum opinion and order entered on
June 2, 2011 (Doc. 136), and the memorandum opinion and order entered this date,
it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that JUDGMENT be and is
hereby entered in favor defendants, City of Mobile, Harry Milbrath, Bryan Mims,
Carlos Walton, Clay Godwin, Joe Cotner and Kevin Rodgers, and against plaintiff,
Antonio Love.1 Therefore, plaintiff’s claims against said defendants are hereby
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Costs of the aforementioned defendants are to
be taxed against the plaintiff.
DONE and ORDERED this 29th day of August, 2011.
/s/ Callie V. S. Granade
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
court notes that plaintiff’s claims against defendants, White-Spunner & Associates, Inc.
and Azalea Center, LLC, were dismissed without prejudice on stipulation of the parties (Doc. 60) as
of November 2, 2010 by order dated October 27, 2010 (Doc. 64); that plaintiff’s claims against
defendants, Officer David Fenner and Officer Albert Priselac, were dismissed without prejudice
pursuant to the plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal (Doc. 77) by order dated December 8, 2010
(Doc. 78); and that plaintiff’s claims against defendants, Dollar General Corporation and Kenneth
Gooden, were dismiss with prejudice pursuant to the parties’ joint motion to dismiss (Doc. 151) by
order dated August 9, 2011 (Doc. 153).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?