Muhammad v. Columbus et al
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING the 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 7/27/10. Copy mailed to plaintiff. (tgw)
<![CDATA[
Muhammad v. Columbus et al
Doc. 8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION MARCUS ORLANDO TATE, a/k/a MARCUS ORLANDO TAITE, a/k/a DR. ELIJAH JOSHUA MUHAMMAD, II, a/k/a DRELIJAH JOSHUA MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, vs. CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION 10-0211-WS-N
ORDER After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is further ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g). DONE this 27th day of July, 2010. s/WILLIAM H. STEELE CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
