Rodgers v. Lovette et al

Filing 20

JUDGMENT that the claims against Dft State of Alabama are DISMISSED w/prejudice as frivolous as set out; the claims against Dft Lovette are DISMISSED w/o prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted as set out; & supplemental jurisdiction is DECLINED. This action is DISMISSED in its entirety as set out. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 7/19/2011. (copy to Plf on 7/20/11; copy to Commissioner of ADOC w/copy of R&R & Order Adopting R&R on 7/20/11) (tot)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION SHERRY T. RODGERS, #263022, : Plaintiff, : vs. : SHERIFF JAMES LOVETTE, et al., : Defendants. CIVIL ACTION 10-0279-CG-N : JUDGMENT It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the claims against defendant State of Alabama be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), that the claims against defendant Lovette be and are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and that supplemental jurisdiction be and is hereby DECLINED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED in its entirety. this action be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) because plaintiff=s claims are either frivolous or fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. DONE this 19th day of July, 2011. /s/ Callie V. S. Granade UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?