Rodgers v. Lovette et al
JUDGMENT that the claims against Dft State of Alabama are DISMISSED w/prejudice as frivolous as set out; the claims against Dft Lovette are DISMISSED w/o prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted as set out; & supplemental jurisdiction is DECLINED. This action is DISMISSED in its entirety as set out. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 7/19/2011. (copy to Plf on 7/20/11; copy to Commissioner of ADOC w/copy of R&R & Order Adopting R&R on 7/20/11) (tot)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SHERRY T. RODGERS, #263022,
SHERIFF JAMES LOVETTE, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION 10-0279-CG-N
It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the claims against
defendant State of Alabama be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), that the claims against defendant Lovette be
and are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)
for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and that supplemental
jurisdiction be and is hereby DECLINED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this
action be and is hereby DISMISSED in its entirety. this action be and is hereby
DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) because
plaintiff=s claims are either frivolous or fail to state a claim upon which relief can be
DONE this 19th day of July, 2011.
/s/ Callie V. S. Granade
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?