Bishop et al v. Physicians Pain Specialists of Alabama et al
Filing
64
JUDGMENT in favor of Physicians Pain Specialists of Alabama against Amanda Christine Dickerson. Plaintiff's claims against said defendant are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Costs are to be taxed against the plaintiff.Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 10/4/2011. (mab)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
AMANDA CHRISTINE DICKERSON, )
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
PHYSICIANS PAIN SPECIALISTS
)
OF ALABAMA, P.C.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-0337-CG-C
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the court=s order entered this date (Doc. 63), it is
ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that JUDGMENT be and is hereby
entered in favor of defendant, Physicians Pain Specialists of Alabama, P.C., and
against plaintiff, Amanda Christine Dickerson.1 Therefore, plaintiff’s claims
against said defendant are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Costs are
to be taxed against the plaintiff.
DONE and ORDERED this 4th day of October, 2011.
/s/ Callie V. S. Granade
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1The
court notes that the claims of plaintiffs Janice Bishop and Amanda Christine Dickerson
against defendant Blue Cross Blue Shield were dismissed with prejudice on motion and joint
stipulation of the parties (Doc. 39) as of April 26, 2011 pursuant to the court’s order issued on April
19, 2011 (Doc. 40). The court further notes that plaintiff Janice Bishop’s claims against defendant
Physicians Pain Specialists of Alabama, P.C. were dismissed with prejudice on joint motion of the
parties (Doc. 44) pursuant to the order issued on July 13, 2011 (Doc. 45).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?