Cunningham v. Honeywell International, Inc.

Filing 113

ORDER DISMISSING PARTY Compudyne, Inc., formerly Robintech, Inc. re: Notice #82 filed by William M. Cunningham, Jr.. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 4/6/2011. (cmj)

Cunningham v. Honeywell International, Inc.

Doc. 113

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM M. CUNNINGHAM, JR., PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE AND EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF REBECCA C. CUNNINGHAM, DECEASED, Plaintiff, v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-00671-KD-C ) ) ) )

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff's "Rule 41(a)(1)(i) Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice as to Compudyne, Inc., formerly Robintech, Inc. d/b/a York Shipley, Inc." (Doc. 82). Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses all of his claims against Defendant Compudyne, Inc., formerly Robintech, Inc., d/b/a York Shipley, Inc., without prejudice. A Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) Notice of Dismissal is permissible if filed "before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment[.]" This action was commenced on December 3, 2010. (Doc. 1). The record reveals that Defendant Compudyne, Inc., formerly Robintech, Inc., d/b/a York Shipley, Inc., has not filed an answer or motion for summary judgment in this case. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that all of the Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Compudyne, Inc., formerly Robintech, Inc., d/b/a York Shipley, Inc., are hereby
1

Dockets.Justia.com

DISMISSED without prejudice. Both parties shall bear their own costs. Nothing herein shall be construed as dismissing any of the Plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants. DONE and ORDERED this the 6th day of April 2011. /s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2