Cunningham v. Honeywell International, Inc.

Filing 93

ORDER DISMISSING PARTY Reilly-Benton Company, Inc. without prejudice re: Notice 59 filed by William M. Cunningham, Jr.. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 4/5/2011. (cmj)

Download PDF
Cunningham v. Honeywell International, Inc. Doc. 93 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM M. CUNNINGHAM, JR., PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE AND EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF REBECCA C. CUNNINGHAM, DECEASED, Plaintiff, v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-00671-KD-C ) ) ) ) ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff's "Rule 41(a)(1)(i) Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice as to Reilly-Benton Company, Inc." (Doc. 59). Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses all of his claims against Defendant Reilly-Benton Company, Inc. without prejudice. A Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) Notice of Dismissal is permissible if filed "before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment[.]" This action was commenced on December 3, 2010. (Doc. 1). The record reveals that Defendant Reilly-Benton Company, Inc. has not filed an answer or motion for summary judgment in this case. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that all of the Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Reilly-Benton Company, Inc. are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Both parties shall bear their own costs. 1 Nothing herein shall be construed as dismissing any of the Plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants. DONE and ORDERED this the 5th day of April 2011. /s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?