Lundy v. Alabama Dept. of Corrections

Filing 26

ORDER ADOPTING 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is ORDERED that this habeas petition be DISMISSED as time-barred. It is further ORDERED that Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and, therefore, not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Butler, Jr on 10/31/2011. copy mailed to petitioner. (sdb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION RODNEY MITCHELL LUNDY, Petitioner, vs. J. C. GILES, Respondent. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION 11-0018-CB-M ORDER After due and proper consideration of all pleadings in this file, and there having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this habeas petition be DISMISSED as time-barred. It is further ORDERED that Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and, therefore, not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. DONE this 31st day of October, 2011. s/Charles R. Butler, Jr. CHARLES R. BUTLER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?