Vision Bank v. Herbert
ORDER DENYING 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 Motions for Conditional Judgment Against Garnishees as set out. Writs of Garnishment (Docs. 41, 43, 45, 47) issued on 4/24/14 are VACATED. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 7/1/2014. (copies mailed to Garnishees on 7/1/14) (tot)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SE PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC,
JULE R. HERBERT, JR.,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-0089-CG-M
This cause is before the court on the plaintiff’s Motions for Conditional
Judgment Against Garnishees (Docs. 51-54).
The court notes that the Consent Judgment entered on October 11, 2011
(Doc. 24) was entered in favor of plaintiff, Vision Bank, and not SE Property
Holdings, LLC. There has been no motion to substitute SE Property Holdings for
Vision Bank filed in the action pursuant to Rule 25(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure. Therefore, the plaintiff’s motions for conditional judgment against the
garnishees (Docs. 51-54) are DENIED, and the Writs of Garnishment issued on
April 24, 2014, (Docs. 41,43,45,47) are VACATED.
DONE and ORDERED this 1st day of July, 2014.
/s/ Callie V. S. Granade
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?