Johnson v. Ashworth et al

Filing 251

JUDGMENT in favor of Dfts James English, James Pate, Roger Marsh, Penton Ashworth, Donald Bell, Chris Mummert against Plf David L. Johnson as set out. Accordingly, Plfs claims against Ashworth, Dunn, Pate, Marsh, Bell, Mummert & English are DISMISSED w/prejudice. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 5/5/2015. (tot)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION DAVID L. JOHNSON, AIS 134016, Plaintiff, vs. PENTON ASHWORTH, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CA. 11-0228-CG-C FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Orders entered on March 27, 2014 (Doc. 214) and March 31, 2015 (Doc. 250), it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that JUDGMENT is entered against Plaintiff, David L. Johnson, and in favor of: 1) Defendant James English on all claims asserted against him; 2) Defendants James Pate and Roger Marsh on the Plaintiff’s claims for assault and battery, for negligent failure to allow ADOC procedure, and for willful and wanton misconduct; 3) Defendant Penton Ashworth on Plaintiff’s claims for negligent failure to follow ADOC procedure relating to Dunn’s alleged use of excessive force, for willful and wanton failure to prevent Dunn from kicking and punching plaintiff, for negligent retention and supervision1; and 4) Defaulting Defendants Donald Bell and Christopher Mummert on all claims asserted against them. As noted in the Report and Recommendation entered on January 27, 2015 (Doc. 248), the Plaintiff entered into a compromise settlement with Defendants Kevin Dunn, Penton Ashworth, James Pate, and Roger Marsh on the remaining pending claims prior to the evidentiary hearing held on August 13, 2014. 1 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claims against Penton Ashworth, Kevin Dunn, James Pate, Roger Marsh, Donald Bell, Chris Mummert, and James English are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. DONE and ORDERED this 5th day of May, 2015. /s/ Callie V. S. Granade UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?