Evanston Insurance Company v. Lett et al
Filing
55
FINAL AMENDED JUDGMENT that plaintiff has no duty to defend defendant Damon Lett d/b/a Damon Lett Roofing or defendant Kiker Corporation against any of the claims made in the civil action styled St. Catherine of Siena Parish v. Kiker Corporation, et al., Case No. CV-2010-900578, in the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama, as further set out. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 11/8/2012. copies to parties. (sdb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
DAMON LETT d/b/a DAMON LETT
ROOFING, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION 11-0383-WS-C
FINAL AMENDED JUDGMENT
In accordance with Orders entered on this date and on October 15, 2012, granting
plaintiff’s dispositive motions against all defendants herein, it is ordered, adjudged and
decreed that plaintiff, Evanston Insurance Company, has no duty to defend defendant Damon
Lett d/b/a Damon Lett Roofing or defendant Kiker Corporation against any of the claims made in
the civil action styled St. Catherine of Siena Parish v. Kiker Corporation, et al., Case No. CV2010-900578, in the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama, under policies of insurance
numbered Policy No. CL100301303 and Policy No. CL100301577 issued by Evanston to Lett
Roofing. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that Evanston has no duty to indemnify
either Kiker or Lett Roofing for any damages alleged by defendant St. Catherine of Siena Parish
in the state-court lawsuit, and that there is no coverage available under the subject insurance
policies to pay for any damages awarded or obtained, whether via settlement or judgment, by St.
Catherine or Kiker in the underlying lawsuit.
DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of November, 2012.
s/ WILLIAM H. STEELE
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?