Kruse v. Byrne et al

Filing 149

JUDGMENT is entered against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendants Dale Byrne, Kenneth EarlMay, Connie Johanna Pimperl, Rocky Lee Langham, Gregory E. Pinkard, Steve R. Drinkard,Edward Scott, and the Baldwin County Commission on all of Plaintiffs claims against them in this action, which are DISMISSED with prejudice; JUDGMENT is entered against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendant Jimmie L. Williams onPlaintiffs claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against her in Count I of the Second AmendedComplaint (Doc. 75); and Plaintiffs state law claims against Defendants Jimmie L. Williams and Charles E. Sherman(Counts IV, V, and VI of the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 75)) are DISMISSED withoutprejudice, as the Court declines to continue exercising supplemental jurisdiction over them pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367.. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 12/3/2013. (cmj)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
FRANK KRUSE, as personal representative
of Jacob Jordan, deceased,
Plaintiff,
vs.
DALE BYRNE, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00513-KD-C

JUDGMENT
In accordance with the Court’s Order entered on this date, the Court’s Order (Doc. 138) dated
October 7, 2013, and the Court’s Order (Doc. 98) dated November 8, 2012, it is hereby ORDERED,
ADJUDGED and DECREED as follows:
1. JUDGMENT is entered against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendants Dale Byrne, Kenneth Earl
May, Connie Johanna Pimperl, Rocky Lee Langham, Gregory E. Pinkard, Steve R. Drinkard,
Edward Scott, and the Baldwin County Commission on all of Plaintiff’s claims against them in
this action, which are DISMISSED with prejudice;1
2. JUDGMENT is entered against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendant Jimmie L. Williams on
Plaintiff’s claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against her in Count I of the Second Amended
Complaint (Doc. 75); and
3. Plaintiff’s state law claims against Defendants Jimmie L. Williams and Charles E. Sherman
(Counts IV, V, and VI of the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 75)) are DISMISSED without
prejudice, as the Court declines to continue exercising supplemental jurisdiction over them
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367.
DONE and ORDERED this the 3rd day of December 2013.
/s/ Kristi K. DuBose
KRISTI K. DuBOSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1

Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed with prejudice all claims against Defendant Carla Wasdin prior to entry of
judgment. (Docs. 97, 136).