Hines v. Thomas et al
ORDER ADOPTING the 53 AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) as the claims either fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted or are frivolous. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 8/25/2016. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. Copy of Order, Judgment & Amended R&R mailed to ADOC. (tgw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
THOMAS CURTIS HINES, #118977
KIM THOMAS, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION 11-0644-WS-C
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to
the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Amended Report
and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Amended Report and
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is
ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is
hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) as the claims either fail to state a claim upon which relief can be
granted or are frivolous.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to send to the Commissioner of the Alabama
Department of Corrections a copy of the amended report and recommendation
recommending the dismissal of this action, of this order adopting the amended report
and recommendation, and of the judgment dismissing this action.
DONE this 25th day of August, 2016.
s/WILLIAM H. STEELE
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?