Hines v. Thomas et al

Filing 59

ORDER ADOPTING the 53 AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) as the claims either fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted or are frivolous. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 8/25/2016. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. Copy of Order, Judgment & Amended R&R mailed to ADOC. (tgw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION THOMAS CURTIS HINES, #118977 Plaintiff, : : vs. : KIM THOMAS, et al., : Defendants. CIVIL ACTION 11-0644-WS-C : ORDER After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Amended Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Amended Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) as the claims either fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted or are frivolous. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send to the Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections a copy of the amended report and recommendation recommending the dismissal of this action, of this order adopting the amended report and recommendation, and of the judgment dismissing this action. DONE this 25th day of August, 2016. s/WILLIAM H. STEELE CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?