Sears v. Williams et al

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 12 Complaint filed by Maurice Lamont Sears. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants White, Meyer, Hetrick, Mosley, Thomas, Bentley, and Personnel Department are dismissed from this action wi th prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) as the claims against them are either frivolous or fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 2/25/2013. (copy mailed to plaintiff) (cmj)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MAURICE LAMONT SEARS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ANTHONY WILLIAMS, et al.,
Defendants.

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

CIVIL ACTION NO.11-00719-KD-B

ORDER
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the
issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation
to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made
under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated January 3, 2013, is hereby ADOPTED as the opinion
of this Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants White, Meyer,
Hetrick, Mosley, Thomas, Bentley and Personnel Department, are DISMISSED with prejudice
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii), as the claims against them are either frivolous
or fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
DONE and ORDERED this the 25th day of February 2013.
/s/ Kristi K. DuBose
KRISTI K. DuBOSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE