United States of America v. 0.13 Acres of Land, more or less, Located in Evergreen, Conecuh County, State of Alabama et al
Order granting re: 20 Status Report/Joint Motion to Stay filed by United States of America. This action is stayed until 7/9/13. Status Report due by 4/11/2013. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 1/11/2013. (cmj)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
0.13 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR
LESS, LOCATED IN EVERGREEN,
CONECUH COUNTY, STATE OF
ALABAMA; CHARLES M. WARD, JR.;
ADMINISTRATOR, SMALL BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION; THE COUNTRY
STORE; AND CONECUH COUNTY
REVENUE COMMISSIONER, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-0238
This condemnation action is before the Court on the joint motion to stay filed by the
United States of America and defendant Charles M. Ward, Jr. (doc. 20). The United States and
Ward move the Court for a stay of 180 days pending resolution of related cases wherein the
parties and issues are largely similar. Upon consideration and for the reasons set forth herein, the
motion is GRANTED as set forth herein.
In general, a district court may stay an action as a means of controlling its docket and
managing its cases. Ortega Trujillo v. Conover & Co. Communications, Inc., 221 F.3d 1262,
1264 (11th Cir. 2000) ((citing Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 117 S.Ct. 1636, 1650 (1997) (a
district court has “broad discretion to stay proceedings as an incident to its power to control its
own docket”). A district court may also stay an action “pending the resolution of related
proceedings in another forum.” Id. (citation omitted). However, the “district court must limit
properly the scope of the stay” and the stay “must not be ‘immoderate.’" Id. “[A] stay is
immoderate and hence unlawful unless so framed in its inception that its force will be spent
within reasonable limits, so far at least as they are susceptible of prevision and description." Id.
(quoting Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 57 S.Ct. 163, 167 (1936)).
This action was stayed until March 1, 2013 and the parties were ordered to file a joint
status report by December 14, 2012. (Doc. 18) In the status report, the United States and Ward
report that the parties have engaged in discovery, conferred several times, and are working
toward resolution of this action as well as two companion cases: United States of America v.
55.12 Acres of Land, et al, Civil Action No. 12-0237-C, and United States of America v. 74.57
Acres of Land, et al, Civil Action No. 12-0239-WS-N. Ward and the United States inform the
Court that resolution of the underlying issues in these actions will directly impact the triable issue of just
compensation and best use.
As previously stated, the United States paid into Court $483.00 as just compensation for
the 0.13 acre at issue and Ward disputed “the correctness of the estimated just compensation”.
(Docs. 9, 15, 18) The Court found that “in lieu of costs and expenses of litigation possibly
consuming the bulk of the $483.00 or any increase in compensation that may be available for this
small parcel of land” the parties “anticipated allowing the just compensation for the 0.13 acre to
rise or fall with the just compensation determined” for the larger parcel.
Therefore, upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court finds that a limited stay remains
appropriate in this action. Accordingly this action is stayed until July 9, 2013. The United States and
Ward are ORDERED to file a joint status report on or before April 11, 2013, to advise the
Court as to the status of this action.
Done and ordered this 11th day of January, 2013.
s/ Kristi K. DuBose
KRISTI K. DuBOSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?