Ametco Manufacturing Corporation v. The Hanover Insurance Company, Inc. et al
Filing
9
Supplemental Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order re: the applicability of ESI in the 8 Supplement to Rule 26(f) Report filed by Complete Building Corporation, The Hanover Insurance Company, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 7/6/2012. (sdb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.
AMETCO MANUFACTURING
CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
THE HANOVER INSURANCE
COMPANY, INC. and COMPLETE
BUILDING CORPORATION,
:
Defendants.
CA 1:12-00257-KD-C
:
SUPPLEMENTAL RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING ORDER
A supplemental Rule 26(f) Report (Doc. 8) has been reviewed. And it is decided
that the parties have examined the applicability of electronically stored information (or
“ESI”) to this matter and have agreed as to the manner of its production. Any variance
from these agreements must be explained fully if any motion concerning the production
of ESI is filed.
DONE and ORDERED this the 6th day of July, 2012.
s/WILLIAM E. CASSADY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?