King v. Clarke County, Alabama

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Dft's 6 MOTION to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART. Count I of the complaint & that portion of Count II of the complaint that attempts to raise race discrimination/retaliation claims under Title VII are DISMISSED. Dft is to file its answer to the remaining counts in the complaint NLT 11/6/12. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 10/24/2012. (copy mailed to Plf on 10/24/12) (tot)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION VERGIE KING, : Plaintiff, : vs. : CLARKE COUNTY, ALABAMA, : Defendant. Civil No. 12-0312-CG-C : ORDER After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated September 27, 2012 (Doc. 17) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. The defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 6) is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Therefore, Count I of the complaint and that portion of Count II of the complaint that attempts to raise race discrimination/retaliation claims under Title VII are hereby DISMISSED. The defendant is ORDERED to file its answer to the remaining counts in the complaint no later than November 6, 2012. DONE and ORDERED this 24th day of October, 2012. /s/ Callie V. S. Granade UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?