Johnson et al v. Champion
ORDER denying without prejudice the 76 Motion to Determine Who Among the Parties of this Litigation has the Superior Title to the Property as Shown by Legal Evidence, This Property Being the Benchmark of this Litigation, and the Proximate Cause of the Constitutional Violations Imbued in the Original Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 7/22/2013. Copy mailed to Plaintiffs. (tgw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
REGINALD JOHNSON, et al.,
RANDALL CHAMPIONS, et al.,
) CIVIL ACTION 12-0334-WS-M
The plaintiffs have filed a “Leave for Motion to Determine Who among the
Parties of this Litigation Has the Superior Title to the Property as Shown by Legal
Evidence ….” (Doc. 76). The Court concluded that this unwieldy document may
be construed as a motion for partial summary judgment but offered the defendants
an opportunity to express their views. (Doc. 77).
The defendants respond, inter alia, that consideration of a motion for partial
summary judgment on the quiet title issue is premature because their position on
the issue will depend in part on evidence from the plaintiffs’ depositions
(including the plaintiffs’ privity vel non with Rosemary Johnson), which
depositions have yet to be taken. (Doc. 78, Kaffer Declaration).1
“If a nonmovant shows by affidavit or declaration that, for specified
reasons, it cannot present facts essential to justify its opposition, the court may …
defer considering the motion or deny it ….” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d). The
defendants have satisfied Rule 56(d), and the Court concludes that the most
appropriate course is to deny the plaintiffs’ motion as premature.
For the reasons set forth above, the plaintiffs’ motion is denied, without
prejudice to their ability to file a similar motion at an appropriate time.
The discovery deadline is September 27, 2013. (Doc. 39 at 1).
DONE and ORDERED this 22nd day of July, 2013.
s/ WILLIAM H. STEELE
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?