Omni Health and Fitness of Mobile, LLC v. Stephenson et al
ORDER ADOPTING 67 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that plaintiff's 26 Motion to Strike is DENIED, defendant Stephenson's 59 Motion to Strike is DENIED, Defendant Stephenson's 3 Motion to Re-align the Parties is DENIED, and plaintiff's 30 MOTION to Remand is GRANTED. Therefore, this action is hereby REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 11/1/2012. (mab)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
OMNI HEALTH AND FITNESS
OF MOBILE, LLC,
HOYT STEPHENSON, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-00407-CG-B
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant
to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is
ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.
It is ORDERED that defendant Stephenson’s motion to strike (Doc. 26) is
DENIED, plaintiff’s motion to strike (Doc. 59) is DENIED, defendant Stephenson’s
motion to re-align the parties (Doc. 3) is DENIED, and plaintiff’s motion to remand
(Doc. 30) is GRANTED.
Therefore, this action is hereby REMANDED to the
Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama.
DONE and ORDERED this 1st day of November, 2012.
/s/ Callie V. S. Granade
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?