Hooper v. Mobile County Metro Jail
ORDER ADOPTING 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 8 MOTION to Amend Complaint. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) as Plaintiff's claims are either frivolous or fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 7/2/2013. copy mailed. (sdb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
DEMETRIC HOOPER, AIS #116907,
MOBILE COUNTY METRO JAIL,
CIVIL ACTION NO: 12-00733-KD-B
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the
issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation
to which objection is made (Doc. 7), the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated June 17, 2013 (Doc. 6), is hereby ADOPTED as
the opinion of this Court.
Additionally, as to Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend his Complaint (Doc. 8), the motion is
DENIED because the amendment fails to provide any details which would state a Section 1983
claim against any of the proposed defendants.
As such, it is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) as Plaintiff’s claims are either frivolous or fail to state a claim
upon which relief can be granted.
DONE and ORDERED this the 2nd day of July 2013.
/s/ Kristi K. DuBose
KRISTI K. DuBOSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?