Quick v. Cochran et al
ORDER denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; adopting Report and Recommendations re 4 Report and Recommendation. After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there h aving been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(l)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the plaintiffs complaint is due to be, and hereby is, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in accordance with Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute and abide by the orders of the Court,. Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Butler, Jr on 5/6/2013. (adk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
ROSSTON N. QUICK,
SAM COCHRAN, et al.,
: CIVIL ACTION 13-0085-CB-M
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file
deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no
objections filed,1 the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion
of this Court.
It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby
DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to obey the
DONE this 6th day of May, 2013.
s/Charles R. Butler,Jr.
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Magistrate Judge recommended that this action be dismissed because
Plaintiff failed to respond to the Court’s order that he file a signed copy
of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. That order was mailed to
Plaintiff and was not returned. The Report and Recommendation was mailed
to Plaintiff at the same address and was returned as undeliverable.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?