Glatfelter v. Cochran et al

Filing 16

ORDER ADOPTING 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Gladfelter's claims against Dfts Cochran, Oliver, Stallworth & Williams are DISMISSED w/prejudice as frivolous; his claims against Dft Barrett seeking to impose liability based on others' acti ons are DISMISSED w/prejudice as frivolous; his claims against Dft Barrett for ignoring Plf's requests are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim; & his claims against Dfts Simmons & Ezell are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 5/20/2014. (copy mailed to Plf on 5/20/14) (tot)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION STEVEN KEITH GLATFELTER, Plaintiff, vs. SAM COCHRAN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-0122-CG-B ORDER After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Gladfelter’s claims against Defendants Cochran, Oliver, Stallworth, and Williams be DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous; that his claims against Defendant Barrett seeking to impose liability based on others’ actions be DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous; that his claims against Defendant Barrett for ignoring Plaintiff’s requests be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim; and that his claims against Defendants Simmons and Ezell be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). DONE and ORDERED this 20th day of May, 2014. /s/ Callie V. S. Granade UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?